What investors really look for (and it’s not your deck).
An investor just wrote about shutting down a startup he had backed.
Great product. Great team. Big brand partnerships.
But the comment was…
“Just can’t find a way to unlock customer acquisition.”
For investors, that sentence has a very precise meaning:
the distribution risk is unsolved.
Something that’s not said enough is:
Investors are not just buying you and your product story.
They also want risk reduction.
By the time you walk into the room, they assume you can build something.
What they really want to know is:
Can you get this in front of enough of the right people (your target market)?
At a cost that makes sense?
In a way that does not fall apart when you are not in the room?
And here’s the part founders often miss.
Distribution risk is not just “marketing”.
It’s a bundle of risks investors are trying to price:
Channel risk: Do you have 1–2 channels that reliably produce leads? Or just “we’ll do paid and content”.
Message risk: Do you know which promise and angle gets attention from the right buyer?
Conversion risk: Can you turn interest into revenue, consistently?
Retention risk: Do customers stick, expand, or refer? Or do you keep refilling a leaky bucket?
Founder dependency risk: Does growth depend on your personal hustle, or can the system run without you?
In other words:
“If I gave you £100k tomorrow, where would you spend it and what would you expect to get back and by when?”
If you can’t answer that, you don’t have an engine yet.
You have a product with some activity around it.
A real engine is simple math, explained clearly:
Reach: How many qualified people can you get in front of this month?
Conversion: What percentage take the next step, then buy?
CAC: What does it cost to acquire a customer?
Payback: How long until you earn that CAC back?
Even at early stage, you can show evidence.
And investors love founders who can say:
“Here are the 3 acquisition loops we tested.”
“Here is what performed, and what didn’t.”
“Here is why we think it worked.”
“Here is what we’re scaling next, and what we expect to see in 30, 60, 90 days.”
The founders who get funded know their numbers at this level:
How many qualified people they can reach this month.
What percentage of them buy.
What they pay to acquire each customer.
How long it takes to earn the investment back.
If you want a practical way to pressure-test this, use this checklist before you pitch:
Your best-performing channel today, and why it wins
2–3 experiments you ran, with results (even small results)
Your funnel in one line: attention → lead → sale
Your bottleneck right now (be honest)
Exactly what money fixes next, and how you’ll measure success
Let’s go back to basics.
If you are raising, make sure you have tried and tested ways to acquire customers.
This is why this month’s episode of Cutting Through The Fog matters.
I sit down with Gen Z founder Melissa Dewar (The Modernists) for a brutally honest conversation about building across generations.
Melissa’s story is a masterclass in reducing investor risk without sounding like she’s “pitching”.
Architecture trained her to think in constraints.
Bootstrapping forced her to stay close to customers.
And that in combination with her incredible story builds what investors really want:
A founder who can say:
“I know what drives demand.”
“I know what breaks.”
“I know what to fix next.”
“I will make it happen.”
Then we zoom out into Gen Z vs Gen X.
Gen X tends to trust proof through track record and repeatable systems.
Gen Z tends to build proof in public through attention, community, and storytelling.
The winners are the founders who can do both.
They can earn attention.
Then convert it into a reliable engine.
And that’s why, despite everything happening in the world, this might be the most exciting time to build.
Full episode below:
We have a few new people in the newsletter, so you can get my FREE startup checklist in the link below.
